Axe DevTools Pro ACT Implementation
Consistent | Partially consistent | |
---|---|---|
WCAG 2 rules | 16 | 1 |
Proposed rules | 17 | 18 |
Implemented Rules
About Axe DevTools Pro Results
Axe DevTools Pro combines the automated results of axe-core, and results from
axe Intelligent Guided Test (IGT) tools. Tools can produced multiple issue types.
The ID of each issue type is given as the name of the procedure, with the tool
that returns it in brackets. For example alt-text-not-meaningful (Images)
is
the alt-text-not-meaningful
issue type reported by the Images
tool.
Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by Deque Systems. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.
Implementation Details
autocomplete attribute has valid value
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
autocomplete-valid
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
autocomplete attribute has valid value
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 20 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
autocomplete-valid | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | passed |
Button has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
button-name
, and aria-command-name
procedures.
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Button has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 17 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
button-name | aria-command-name | |
---|---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | inapplicable | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 6 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 7 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 2 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 3 | inapplicable | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 5 | failed | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | inapplicable |
Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
valid-lang
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 19 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
valid-lang | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | passed, failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 * | passed |
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
presentation-role-conflict
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers 9 of the 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
presentation-role-conflict | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Form field has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
label
, aria-input-field-name
, and select-name
procedures.
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Form field has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 17 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
label | aria-input-field-name | select-name | |
---|---|---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 6 | inapplicable | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 7 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Failed Example 2 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Failed Example 3 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Failed Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable | failed |
Failed Example 5 | inapplicable | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 6 | inapplicable | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 7 | inapplicable | failed | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | passed |
HTML page has lang attribute
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
html-has-lang
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page has lang attribute
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
html-has-lang | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
html-lang-valid
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
html-lang-valid | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
HTML page lang and xml:lang attributes have matching values
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
html-xml-lang-mismatch
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page lang and xml:lang attributes have matching values
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 12 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
html-xml-lang-mismatch | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
HTML page has non-empty title
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
document-title
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page has non-empty title
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 11 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
document-title | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Image button has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
input-image-alt
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Image button has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 12 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
input-image-alt | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Image has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
image-alt
, and role-img-alt
procedures.
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Image has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 18 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
image-alt | role-img-alt | |
---|---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | passed |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 6 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 7 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 8 | passed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 2 | inapplicable | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 4 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 5 | failed | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
avoid-inline-spacing
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Letter spacing in style attributes is not !important
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
avoid-inline-spacing | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Link has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
link-name
, and area-alt
procedures.
Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Link has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 28 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
link-name | area-alt | |
---|---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 6 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 7 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 8 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 9 | passed | inapplicable |
Passed Example 10 | inapplicable | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 2 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 3 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 4 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 5 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 6 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 7 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 8 | failed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 9 | inapplicable | failed |
Failed Example 10 | failed | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | inapplicable |
Passed Example 11 | passed | inapplicable |
Failed Example 11 | failed | inapplicable |
Word spacing in style attributes is not !important
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
avoid-inline-spacing
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Word spacing in style attributes is not !important
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 16 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
avoid-inline-spacing | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
svg-img-alt
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
svg-img-alt | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
nested-interactive
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
nested-interactive | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | passed, failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed, failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
td-headers-attr
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
WCAG 2 rule.
It covers all 17 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
td-headers-attr | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | passed, failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-valid-attr
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
proposed rule.
It covers all 7 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
aria-valid-attr | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-hidden-focus
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
proposed rule.
It covers 12 of the 14 examples.
On 2 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
aria-hidden-focus | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
ARIA required context role
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-required-parent
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA required context role
proposed rule.
It covers 14 of the 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
aria-required-parent | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
ARIA required owned elements
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-required-children
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
ARIA required owned elements
proposed rule.
It covers all 19 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
aria-required-children | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | passed, failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
ARIA state or property is permitted
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-allowed-attr
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA state or property is permitted
proposed rule.
It covers all 15 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
aria-allowed-attr | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Passed Example 11 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
ARIA state or property has valid value
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-valid-attr-value
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
ARIA state or property has valid value
proposed rule.
It covers 22 of the 24 examples.
On 1 example
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None |
|
aria-valid-attr-value | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | failed |
Failed Example 10 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Block of repeated content is collapsible
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
bypass
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Block of repeated content is collapsible
proposed rule.
It covers 1 of the 8 examples.
On 7 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
bypass | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
bypass
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
proposed rule.
It covers 9 of the 14 examples.
On 5 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
bypass | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Passed Example 11 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 12 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
css-orientation-lock
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property
proposed rule.
It covers 9 of the 10 examples.
On 1 example
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
css-orientation-lock | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Document has heading for non-repeated content
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
bypass
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Document has heading for non-repeated content
proposed rule.
It covers 10 of the 14 examples.
On 2 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
bypass | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
bypass
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
proposed rule.
It covers 8 of the 12 examples.
On 2 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
bypass | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
bypass
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
proposed rule.
It covers 5 of the 8 examples.
On 3 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
None | None |
bypass | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Form field label is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
label-visible-not-descriptive (forms)
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Form field label is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers 10 of the 14 examples.
For 4 examples
no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
test results.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
label-visible-not-descriptive (forms) | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | untested |
Failed Example 5 | untested |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | untested |
Inapplicable Example 3 | untested |
Heading has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
empty-heading
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Heading has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 15 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
empty-heading | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
HTML page title is descriptive
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
title-not-meaningful (structure)
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
HTML page title is descriptive
proposed rule.
It covers 5 of the 6 examples.
On 1 example
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
title-not-meaningful (structure) | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | cannot tell |
Id attribute value is unique
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
duplicate-id-aria
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Id attribute value is unique
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
duplicate-id-aria | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
frame-title-unique
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
proposed rule.
It covers 11 of the 23 examples.
On 10 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
frame-title-unique | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 10 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable |
Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
frame-title
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
frame-title | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
frame-focusable-content
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Iframe with negative tabindex has no interactive elements
proposed rule.
It covers all 6 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
frame-focusable-content | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 4 | inapplicable |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Image not in the accessibility tree is decorative
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
alt-text-missing + semantic-hidden (images)
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Image not in the accessibility tree is decorative
proposed rule.
It covers 16 of the 20 examples.
For 1 example
no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
test results.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
alt-text-missing + semantic-hidden (images) | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 5 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | untested |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 7 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 8 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 9 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable |
Error message describes invalid form field value
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
form-error-required-unclear + instructions-not-included (forms)
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Error message describes invalid form field value
proposed rule.
It covers 7 of the 9 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
form-error-required-unclear + instructions-not-included (forms) | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Line height in style attributes is not !important
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
avoid-inline-spacing
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Line height in style attributes is not !important
proposed rule.
It covers all 21 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
avoid-inline-spacing | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
identical-links-same-purpose
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
proposed rule.
It covers 10 of the 21 examples.
On 11 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
identical-links-same-purpose | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 8 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Passed Example 10 | passed |
Passed Example 11 | passed |
Passed Example 12 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 6 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
button-name
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers all 8 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
button-name | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Meta element has no refresh delay
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
meta-refresh
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Meta element has no refresh delay
proposed rule.
It covers all 15 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
meta-refresh | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed, failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 7 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 8 | passed |
Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
meta-refresh-no-exceptions
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
proposed rule.
It covers all 14 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
meta-refresh-no-exceptions | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | passed, failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 7 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 8 | passed |
Meta viewport allows for zoom
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
meta-viewport
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Meta viewport allows for zoom
proposed rule.
It covers all 11 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
meta-viewport | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Role attribute has valid value
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-roles
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Role attribute has valid value
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
aria-roles | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
aria-required-attr
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
proposed rule.
It covers all 8 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
aria-required-attr | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Scrollable element is keyboard accessible
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
scrollable-region-focusable
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Scrollable element is keyboard accessible
proposed rule.
It covers all 10 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
scrollable-region-focusable | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
focus-indicator-missing (keyboard)
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
proposed rule.
It covers all 9 examples.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
focus-indicator-missing (keyboard) | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Table header cell has assigned cells
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
th-has-data-cells
procedure.
The implementation is partially
consistent with the
Table header cell has assigned cells
proposed rule.
It covers 13 of the 16 examples.
On 2 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
None |
th-has-data-cells | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 4 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 5 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable |
Text has minimum contrast
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
color-contrast
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Text has minimum contrast
proposed rule.
It covers 21 of the 28 examples.
On 7 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
color-contrast | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Passed Example 7 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Passed Example 9 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | failed |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 8 | passed, failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 4 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 7 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 11 | inapplicable |
Text has enhanced contrast
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
color-contrast-enhanced
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Text has enhanced contrast
proposed rule.
It covers 22 of the 29 examples.
On 7 examples
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
color-contrast-enhanced | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 3 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | passed |
Passed Example 6 | inapplicable |
Passed Example 7 | passed |
Passed Example 8 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Failed Example 4 | failed |
Failed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 6 | failed |
Failed Example 7 | failed |
Failed Example 8 | failed |
Failed Example 9 | cannot tell |
Failed Example 10 | passed, failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 4 | cannot tell |
Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 6 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 7 | passed |
Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 11 | inapplicable |
Visible label is part of accessible name
This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
label-content-name-mismatch
procedure.
The implementation is
fully consistent with the
Visible label is part of accessible name
proposed rule.
It covers 12 of the 13 examples.
On 1 example
the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical
limitations in tools.
The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
See understanding ACT consistency.
Expected | Reported |
---|---|
|
|
label-content-name-mismatch | |
---|---|
Passed Example 1 | passed |
Passed Example 2 | passed |
Passed Example 3 | passed |
Passed Example 4 | passed |
Passed Example 5 | cannot tell |
Passed Example 6 | passed |
Failed Example 1 | failed |
Failed Example 2 | failed |
Failed Example 3 | failed |
Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable |
Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |