Proposed Orientation of the page is not restricted using CSS transform property
Description
This rule checks that page content is not restricted to either landscape
or portrait
orientation using CSS transform property.
Applicability
This rule applies to any HTML element that is visible and has a CSS transform property that is applied conditionally on the orientation media feature with a value of landscape
or portrait
, where the CSS transform property has any of the below transformation functions:
Note: These specific transformation functions are of interest to this rule as they have the potential to affect the rotation of a given element.
Note: The rotate3d, rotateZ and matrix3d are currently part of a W3C Editor’s Draft.
Expectation
The target element is neither rotated clockwise nor counter clockwise around the Z-axis at an angle corresponding to 90 degrees relative from the position of the element in landscape
orientation to the position of the element in portrait
orientation, and vice versa.
Note: Imagine the display of a smartphone with cartoon figure at its center. With this example, if a user turns the smartphone a quarter turn, that is a partial move from one orientation to the other, the user would expect that the cartoon figure continues to remain facing upwards. The smartphone accomplishes this by rotating the contents of its display a quarter turn to counter the users change in orientation. In effect, the cartoon figure has remained in place and its rotation relative from one orientation to the other is 0 degrees. Now imagine that a developer facilitated this rotation of the cartoon figure by a quarter turn only when the smartphone starts from one orientation and not the other; its rotation relative from one orientation to the other would then be 90 degrees and it would appear stuck, or locked, as the user moves between orientations. What the developer has done is effectively counter the smartphones attempt at countering the users change in orientation.
Assumptions
This rule does not consider and may produce incorrect results for:
- Elements for which a particular display orientation is essential.
- The existence of any control on the page that can change the orientation on demand.
Accessibility Support
There are no major accessibility support issues known for this rule.
Background
Bibliography
- Understanding Success Criterion 1.3.4: Orientation
- CSS Transforms Module Level 1
- CSS Transforms Module Level 2
- CSS3 Media Queries
- Managing screen orientation
- Orientation
- The Transform Rendering Model
Accessibility Requirements Mapping
1.3.4 Orientation (Level AA)
- Learn more about 1.3.4 Orientation
- Required for conformance to WCAG 2.1 on level AA and higher.
- Outcome mapping:
- Any
failed
outcomes: success criterion is not satisfied - All
passed
outcomes: success criterion needs further testing - An
inapplicable
outcome: success criterion needs further testing
- Any
Input Aspects
The following aspects are required in using this rule.
Test Cases
Passed
Passed Example 1
A page where CSS transform property has rotateZ transform function conditionally applied on the orientation media feature which does not restrict the element to either portrait
or landscape
orientation.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
@media (orientation: portrait) {
html {
transform: rotateZ(1turn);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
Page Content
</main>
</body>
</html>
Passed Example 2
A page where CSS transform property has matrix transform function conditionally applied on the orientation media feature which does not restrict the element to either portrait
or landscape
orientation.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
@media (orientation: portrait) {
html {
transform: matrix(1, -1.22465e-15, 1.22465e-15, 1, 0, 0);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
Page Content
</main>
</body>
</html>
Failed
Failed Example 1
A page where CSS transform property has rotate transform function conditionally applied on the orientation media feature which restricts the element to landscape
orientation.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
@media (orientation: portrait) {
html {
transform: rotate(1.5708rad);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
Page Content
</body>
</html>
Failed Example 2
A page where CSS transform property has matrix3d transform function conditionally applied on the orientation media feature which restricts the element to portrait
orientation.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
@media (orientation: landscape) {
body {
transform: matrix3d(0, -1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
Page Content
</body>
</html>
Failed Example 3
This page appears rotated at a slight angle of 2.5 degrees for stylistic purposes, but is locked in portrait orientation by applying a 92.5 degree rotation when in landscape orientation:
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
body {
transform: rotate(2.5deg);
}
@media (orientation: landscape) {
body {
transform: rotate(92.5deg);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
Page Content
</body>
</html>
Inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 1
A page where there are no CSS styles.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
</head>
<body>
I am a page with no styles
</body>
</html>
Inapplicable Example 2
A page that has no CSS transform property specified.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
html {
font-size: 22px;
}
@media (min-width: 30em) {
font-size: 100%;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
Page Content
</body>
</html>
Inapplicable Example 3
A page where CSS transform property is applied to an element that is not visible.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
@media (orientation: lanscape) {
body {
transform: rotateZ(0, 0, 1, 270deg);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body style="display:none;">
<main>
Page Content
</main>
</body>
</html>
Inapplicable Example 4
A page where CSS transform property is not applied conditionally on the orientation media feature.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
body {
transform: rotate(90deg);
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
Page Content
</main>
</body>
</html>
Inapplicable Example 5
A page where CSS transform property is conditionally applied on the orientation media feature, but does not have any of the applicable transformation functions which restricts the element to either landscape
or portrait
orientation.
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Page with some content</title>
<style>
@media (orientation: portrait) {
body {
transform: translateX(100px);
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<main>
Page Content
</main>
</body>
</html>
Glossary
Namespaced Element
An element with a specific namespaceURI value from HTML namespaces. For example an “SVG element” is any element with the “SVG namespace”, which is http://www.w3.org/2000/svg
.
Namespaced elements are not limited to elements described in a specification. They also include custom elements. Elements such as a
and title
have a different namespace depending on where they are used. For example a title
in an HTML page usually has the HTML namespace. When used in an svg
element, a title
element has the SVG namespace instead.
Outcome
An outcome is a conclusion that comes from evaluating an ACT Rule on a test subject or one of its constituent test target. An outcome can be one of the three following types:
- Inapplicable: No part of the test subject matches the applicability
- Passed: A test target meets all expectations
- Failed: A test target does not meet all expectations
Note: A rule has one passed
or failed
outcome for every test target. When there are no test targets the rule has one inapplicable
outcome. This means that each test subject will have one or more outcomes.
Note: Implementations using the EARL10-Schema can express the outcome with the outcome property. In addition to passed
, failed
and inapplicable
, EARL 1.0 also defined an incomplete
outcome. While this cannot be the outcome of an ACT Rule when applied in its entirety, it often happens that rules are only partially evaluated. For example, when applicability was automated, but the expectations have to be evaluated manually. Such “interim” results can be expressed with the incomplete
outcome.
Visible
Content perceivable through sight.
Content is considered visible if making it fully transparent would result in a difference in the pixels rendered for any part of the document that is currently within the viewport or can be brought into the viewport via scrolling.
For more details, see examples of visible.
Rule Versions
This is the first version of this ACT rule.
Implementations
This section is not part of the official rule. It is populated dynamically and not accounted for in the change history or the last modified date.